Relicense the dam and look at the whole watershed issue, not just Conowingo.YES" Stakeholders must take the time to digest the study and follow its lead in mitigating the nutrient's contribution, not pursuing the folly of dredging sediment. This political football must be addressed by knowing the science revealed in this study. Best watershed management practices across NY, PA and MD are the logical solution path, not dredging. This study finds that nutrients are the longer term culprit. Discussions to-date about sedimentation have chased the wrong contributor. The sediment scour effect at Conowingo is significantly less contributory. It shows that the negative contribution to Bay quality stems from nutrients collected in the entire watershed and passed downstream of Conowingo. The arguments surrounding the sediment contribution to the Chesapeake Bay have been extensively examined in the Army Corps of Engineers' recently released federal assessment. 20), Conowingo should be expeditiously relicensed by FERC and permitted to generate electricity by MDE. George Kaplan Colora "In response to recent coverage that the Maryland Department of Environment could deny Conowingo a permit to generate electricity ("MDE intends to deny Conowingo Dam permit," Nov. … We have known what needs to be done to clean up the Bay for decades, and we need to get on with it." The multi-state WIP, overseen by the federal Environmental Protection Agency, is our best hope of forcing Pennsylvania and New York to do their part to clean up that river. Dredging the sediment behind the dam is pointless unless we reduce the upstream sources. "(They) claim to be concerned about the pollution and sediments coming down the Susquehanna River and over the Conowingo Dam.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |